Answered Conundrum Next Conundrum
Would you give up on being considered beautiful if your face wasn't conforming to the "golden ratio"?
This article suggests that beauty is not in the eye of the beholder, but in the ratios of the face:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20091218/ts_afp/psychologywomenuscanada_20091218145408
After reading this if you measured your face and didn't come up golden, would you feel "ugly"? Would you give up on trying to look good in life? or ignore it and go on as usual?
Interesting Question?
Yes (0)
No (0)
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20091218/ts_afp/psychologywomenuscanada_20091218145408
After reading this if you measured your face and didn't come up golden, would you feel "ugly"? Would you give up on trying to look good in life? or ignore it and go on as usual?
- In Beauty and Style |
- |
- Report |
-
Share
RSS
Best Answer Chosen by Asker
Marked as Best!
December 19, 2009 12:00 AM
(0)
(0)
Permalink |
Report
"Angelina Jolie does not have golden length and width ratios," he said.
"Elizabeth Hurley gets the golden ratio for length but is different from the width golden ratio by one percent."
But Canadian country pop musician Shania Twain has "both the length and width ratios."
With these samples and Cheapgamer's tastes I find Angelina the most attractive person on the list and Shania the least attractive, thus rendering the conclusion bunk in my eyes ^_^
The thing is any test like this works on average, but this means that there is still room for individual taste.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20091218/ts_afp/psychologywomenuscanada_20091218145408
"Elizabeth Hurley gets the golden ratio for length but is different from the width golden ratio by one percent."
But Canadian country pop musician Shania Twain has "both the length and width ratios."
With these samples and Cheapgamer's tastes I find Angelina the most attractive person on the list and Shania the least attractive, thus rendering the conclusion bunk in my eyes ^_^
The thing is any test like this works on average, but this means that there is still room for individual taste.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20091218/ts_afp/psychologywomenuscanada_20091218145408
| Asker's Rating: |
• I agree.
Helpful Answer?
(0)
(0)
Permalink |
Report
Reply
Other Answers (1)
December 19, 2009 03:02 AM
(0)
(0)
Permalink |
Report
It is very stupid to base beauty based on this article, and even more stupid to feel ugly and give up on life because you seems for not measuring up to some standard of beauty. There are more to life then being labeled beautiful by some people.
Beauty is how you take care of yourself, how you clean and take care of yourself, how you wear suitable and tasteful clothes, walk and act with confidence and grace. And most important, your personality and character. Physically, Oprah falls short of these standard of beauty, but there are hardly people who will label her "ugly".
Helpful Answer?
Beauty is how you take care of yourself, how you clean and take care of yourself, how you wear suitable and tasteful clothes, walk and act with confidence and grace. And most important, your personality and character. Physically, Oprah falls short of these standard of beauty, but there are hardly people who will label her "ugly".
(0)
(0)
Permalink |
Report
Reply
Answer this Question
View All Beauty and Style QuestionsAsk a Conundrum
Please visit these retailers to purchase Conundrum or find the wine at these fine restaurants:
-
1321 Main St
-
1115 Main St
-
699 St Helena Hwy
-
1991 St Helena Hwy
- Twitter currently unavailable