Answered Conundrum Next Conundrum
Are children being abducted more?
Elizabeth Olten's body was found in a wooded area today, earlier this week Somer Thompson's body was found in a landfill. Are children being abducted more often or do we hear about it faster and more often because of technology?
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,569338,00.html?test=latestnews
Interesting Question?
Yes (1)
No (0)
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,569338,00.html?test=latestnews
- In Belief and Thought |
- |
- Report |
- Share
RSS
Best Answer Chosen by Asker
Marked as Best!
October 23, 2009 11:14 PM
(0)
(0)
Permalink |
Report
Actually, the "stereotypical kidnapping" abductions, where a child is taken by a stranger and kept over 24 hours have gone down for 115 in 1998 (when records were first kept) to 93 in 2001. These cases simply get more attention.
Most child abductions are by family members, and most of those are parental abductions. With the divorce rate tripling since 1960, there are bound to be more of these types of abductions.
"When the categories get conflated, the statistics can become confusing. Take the number 800,000: It's true that 797,500 people under 18 were reported missing in a one-year period, according to a 2002 study. But of those cases, 203,900 were family abductions, 58,200 were nonfamily abductions, and only 115 were "stereotypical kidnappings," defined in one study as "a nonfamily abduction perpetrated by a slight acquaintance or stranger in which a child is detained overnight, transported at least 50 miles, held for ransom or abducted with the intent to keep the child permanently, or killed." Even these categories can be misleading: Overstaying a visit with a noncustodial parent, for example, could qualify as a family abduction. Some individuals get entered into the database multiple times after disappearing on different occasions, resulting in potentially misleading numbers.
Many missing persons aren't reported at all—a 1997 study estimated that only 5 percent of nonfamily abductions (in which a nonfamily member detains a child using force for more than an hour) get reported to police. Some police departments may not even bother filing a report when a kid runs away from home for a few days. It's also easy to lose track of abduction cases, since some of them get filed away under associated crimes, like homicide or sexual assault."
http://www.slate.com/id/2157738/
Most child abductions are by family members, and most of those are parental abductions. With the divorce rate tripling since 1960, there are bound to be more of these types of abductions.
"When the categories get conflated, the statistics can become confusing. Take the number 800,000: It's true that 797,500 people under 18 were reported missing in a one-year period, according to a 2002 study. But of those cases, 203,900 were family abductions, 58,200 were nonfamily abductions, and only 115 were "stereotypical kidnappings," defined in one study as "a nonfamily abduction perpetrated by a slight acquaintance or stranger in which a child is detained overnight, transported at least 50 miles, held for ransom or abducted with the intent to keep the child permanently, or killed." Even these categories can be misleading: Overstaying a visit with a noncustodial parent, for example, could qualify as a family abduction. Some individuals get entered into the database multiple times after disappearing on different occasions, resulting in potentially misleading numbers.
Many missing persons aren't reported at all—a 1997 study estimated that only 5 percent of nonfamily abductions (in which a nonfamily member detains a child using force for more than an hour) get reported to police. Some police departments may not even bother filing a report when a kid runs away from home for a few days. It's also easy to lose track of abduction cases, since some of them get filed away under associated crimes, like homicide or sexual assault."
http://www.slate.com/id/2157738/
| Asker's Rating: |
• Thanks for the information!
Helpful Answer?
(0)
(0)
Permalink |
Report
Reply
Other Answers (2)
October 23, 2009 11:42 PM
(0)
(0)
Permalink |
Report
Child abductions and other crimes perpetrated upon a child are likely publicized more drastically, catch our attention faster, and linger longer in our thoughts because of the severity and reality of these crimes. Having a child abducted, molested, or murdered by a lurking stranger is every parent’s greatest nightmare and likely the source of thousands of dollars worth of security equipment installed in homes nationwide to ward off intruders that may take away or otherwise hurt a young child. However, the perceived increase in child abductions may simply be due to availability heuristic, meaning that once we hear it in the news (especially if its 2x in one week) we automatically assume that these types of incidents actually occur more often than they truly do. We also tend to falsely assume that a mystic stranger is responsible for a child’s disappearance, while failing to recognize dangers posed by individuals whom the child is familiar with and trusts. In fact, a large number of child abductions is perpetrated by close family members or other individuals that child knows. Of course, crimes involving children are blown up by the media to place emphasis on a perceived threat as well as to instigate an emotional appeal to evoke feelings of empathy and sympathy in the general public. Thus, when a child becomes the victim of a violent crime, the community (and those around the nation) will come together and grieve and help each other out. During these times people are most likely more safety-conscious in regards to their own children and feel a great need to stay close to them and protect them from harm.
Helpful Answer?
(0)
(0)
Permalink |
Report
Reply
October 24, 2009 03:15 PM
(0)
(0)
Permalink |
Report
I don't think that children are being abducted more, I think we just hear about it quicker and more often. Between all the social networking sites and the EBS running alerts; as well as the regular media, you will hear about it from somewhere. There is also the leaning of the media to keep everyone in a frenzy when something happens so that they will tune in more to be able to keep up.
Helpful Answer?
(0)
(0)
Permalink |
Report
Reply
dsaldridge