Answered Conundrum Next Conundrum

How do you think your life would change if the average life expectancy was 5,000 years?

"Controversial theorist Aubrey de Grey insists that we are within reach of an engineered cure for aging. Are you prepared to live forever?" is the opening line in the article, "The Prophet of Immortality". Let's just stick to 5,000 years. What's your thoughts?

The article can be read at: http://www.popsci.com/scitech/article/2005-01/prophet-immortality
Interesting Question? Yes (1) No (0)
RSS

Best Answer Chosen by Asker

Marked as Best! October 11, 2009 05:39 PM
Wow! It brings up so many thoughts that it's hard to answer!
Well, first, my largest problem with life may be less of a problem. I don't have enough time to pursue all the ideas I find interesting, or live everywhere I want to live now. I'd relax, as I have more time to accomplish everything I want to do. I'd probably immediately enroll in school again. The opportunities are mind-boggling!
I'd probably be more forgiving of my own mistakes, since they'd have less impact spread out over that span of time.
Think about all the crazy landscaping I could do! I think I'd still want to live right here, but I'd be planting trees with an eye to how they'd look in 100 years or more, rather than 2. oh...but I'd definitely hire a gardener. I'm not sure I want to do the kind of work I'd need to do to create the perfect English lawn.
Pain management and degenerative diseases would definitely become a priority. Who would want to live for 4,950 years in pain? Health issues, in general, would be more important.
I'd become even more dedicated to not acquiring a lot of excess stuff. Can you imagine 5,000 years of knick-knacks cluttering a life? Clothes that don't fit or aren't quite worn out? Gack! I'd try to have a lifestyle that would allow me to explore opportunities as they arrive, that I could pick up and move everything of importance in the span of a week or so.
I could go on and on. You get the idea. Thanks for the wonderful daydream, though!

http://www.crossfitendurance.com/uploads/crossfitendurance/image/sunrise%20yosemite%20valley%2010-08.JPG
Source(s):
My experience and interests
Asker's Rating:
• Thanks for your reflections!
Helpful Answer? (0)   (0)
Permalink | Report
Reply

Other Answers (4)
Sort By

October 11, 2009 09:03 AM
It could become a problem with memory.

Information theory has done calculations on how much information storage capacity is in the humn brain, and the base their estimates on things like humber of connections between neurons, etc.

All the way back to the time of the ancient Greek philosophers, it used to be asked if the human mind was like a blackboard, which could be written on up to a point, after which it was full, or if it could absorb information indefinitly, and it's starting to look like the answer is... sort of both, depending upon life-span.

Current estimates are that, depending on the size of the human brain and the number of neurons in it (human brains vary in size from as litte as 950 cc's up to 1450 cc's, with an average of about 1200 cc's) it's theoretically possible for a human to learn all-out, like at the rate they were when they were a child, for 600 to 2000 years, after which point, in order for new information to come in, old information has to be dropped.

It means that within the context of our current life-span, our minds are basically limitless. You will never run out of capacity.

But... if life were extended to 5000 years... well... things from the earlier parts of their life could start getting fuzzy once they've passed the 600-2000 year mark.

It means that we'd probably have to start supplementing our brains with some auxiliary hardware... memory chips that can interface with the brain so we can keep a longer recall.
Helpful Answer? (1)   (0)
Permalink | Report
Reply
October 11, 2009 07:10 PM
I was thinking about this very thing the other day, because I was reading Lord of the Rings. In that book, some of the races are immortal, and there are a few characters that are thousands of years old.

Assuming we'd live all those thousands of years in good physical condition and with full memory of all our years. then maybe in the best case we'd end up like Elrond:

-- Quote

The face of Elrond was ageless, neither old nor young, though in it was written the memory of many things both glad and sorrowful. His hair was dark as the shadows of twilight, and upon it was set a circlet of silver; his eyes were grey as a clear evening, and in them was a light like the light of stars. Venerable he seemed as a king crowned with many winters, and yet hale as a tried warrior in the fullness of his strength. He was the Lord of Rivendell and mighty among both Elves and Men.

-- /Quote

(The Fellowship of the Ring, Book II, Chapter 1)

Perhaps we'd live long enough to grow wise, and yet stay strong enough to actually put all that wisdom to good use.
Helpful Answer? (0)   (0)
Permalink | Report
Reply
October 12, 2009 12:36 AM
Wow, this is a great question. Life insurance companies would do well in theory, but I think in practice they'd lose the majority of their customers and die. I think people would take MUCH better care of themselves and perhaps even become paranoid about it. Also, the birth rate would have to fall to almost zero pretty quickly or we'd have a whole plethora of resource and space-based problems. Talk about a conundrum!
Helpful Answer? (0)   (0)
Permalink | Report
Reply
October 12, 2009 01:17 AM
If we remained fertile the whole 5000 years, then people who don't believe in birth control would over-populate our planet long before any of the people currently alive lived to be 5000.

Ever read what happens to baby rats when a rat cage is over-populated? It isn't pretty.
Helpful Answer? (0)   (0)
Permalink | Report
Reply

Answer this Question


View All Belief and Thought Questions

Ask a Conundrum


140 characters left

Categories

Large Glass of Conundrum Wine

Welcome to ConundrumLand

Please enter your zip code.