Answered Conundrum Next Conundrum

Is there a connection between an increasing lack of nuance in society and a decreasing emphasis on liberal arts education?

Who could study Merchant of Venice without both hating and sympathizing with Shylock? And how about Jean Valjean in Les Miserables? Men and their ideas today seem so one dimensional. You cannot see the brush strokes on a masterpiece in your text book or on a monitor, you have to visit the museum. You must read the book, go to the opera, observe the play. What does it mean to spring full blown from the head of Zeus, rise from the ashes like a phoenix, or be seduced by a siren song? Are we concentrating on technology, skills, and financial success to the exclusion of thought? Has shouting slogans and waving signs taken the place of honest discourse? Are we losing the value of a liberal arts education, where we learn that it often takes time and effort on our part to even begin to understand other points of view, and where we learn that our own ideas do not reign supreme simply because we believe we are superior to everyone we know. Is this an effect of less emphasis on the historical and current value of good ART, LITERATURE, PHILOSOPHY, RELIGION, MUSIC, etc?
Interesting Question? Yes (1) No (0)
RSS

Best Answer Chosen by Asker

Marked as Best! October 08, 2009 05:52 PM
If you think this age of society lacks nuance and emphasis in liberal arts education, why don't you get one of those supposedly dime a dozen scientists to build you a time machine to travel back to 1900? Then report back and tell us if you still think this is an age filled with single minded, overly ambitious, people who think their own ideas reign supreme.

In answer to your question, no. There is no decreasing emphasis on liberal arts education, simply an increased emphasis on the education of maths and sciences, especially in America. This may create the illusion that no one cares about the arts and humanities, but that's frankly, just sort of ridiculous. Look at any of the top ten bachelors degree lists online, and you'll see English, History, and the Liberal Arts well represented. I'd show you one of them myself, but it's hard to determine which are legitimate and which aren't. But just take a peek through google.

As for the lack of nuance in society, well, that can't exactly be measured. It's something you perceive. And funnily enough, I think society is only more nuanced today than it was in nearly any age previous, all thanks to the internet, something created solely from science and math. You know how books used to only be available to the rich and wealthy before the book press was invented? Well, the internet is like that - now discussion and ideas that might have only been seen by the highly educated (and likely, the rich, since it's often hard to be one without the other) are available to anyone with an internet connection.

You're looking back in history with these rose tinted glasses. Blacks and women didn't have some of the most basic rights til only a short time ago. The poor couldn't afford for children to even finish a high school education - they had to get jobs to support their families. When on earth would those people have had time to read about literature or learn about art, much less be able to afford books on the topic?

Nowadays, yes, we still have problems. Religious zealots still exist, but you're kidding yourself if you think they were more tolerant fifty or even two hundred years ago. People will always have problems seeing things from another point of view, that's just the nature of human beings.

If it will bring you piece of mind, look at the high school requirements of the schools nearest to you. Odds are, they require students to study English and History for 4 years, while only requiring 3 of maths and sciences. Look up forums on the internet where people discuss things. Which subsection will have the most posting and views - one on music, or one on science? Unless you're on a forum about technology, it'll be the music subsection.

So, take off your rose colored glasses and wipe away your sense of entitlement. The liberal arts are alive and well, being shared and discussed by possibly more people than ever in history. Don't silently judge strangers and assume they're narrow minded bigots who couldn't possibly understand your views on philosophy - strike up a discussion with them instead. I think if you're willing to do some of that point of view changing you were going on about people not understanding, you'll be in for a very pleasant surprise.
Asker's Rating:
Helpful Answer? (0)   (1)
Permalink | Report
Reply
October 08, 2009 06:25 PM
having a bad day?
Report
October 08, 2009 06:32 PM
I'll bet if you took the time to get to know me you wouldn't say any of that stuff about me. how about it, you wanna be friends?
Report
October 08, 2009 06:57 PM
Hah, not having a bad day really, I'm just surrounded by friends who look back in history with these unrealistic views and I'm tired of how they put down where society is at now because they think it was so much better back in the day, and they sound very much like your question. I love them, but I think they need a good shake now and then so they realize that they're glorifying the past and not looking at the world around them realistically. And since I can't really do that without offending them, I just...did it here instead. I didn't even intend it to be mean, just sort of harsh since I wish more people would realize that the world is in a pretty incredible place right now.
Report
October 08, 2009 07:03 PM
I actually might agree with a lot of what you said, if I can stop weeping long enough to consider it (lol). My perceptions are not always correct, and I don't mind being challeneged on them. As you said, maybe I can learn something.
Report

Other Answers (1)
Sort By

October 08, 2009 09:57 PM
Nuance requires the ability to make subtle distinctions.

I don't see how a liberal arts education imparts that, as a liberal arts education focuses on general knowledge and relies heavily on the ability to rationalize by the individual. You would think this is conducive to a person having greater nuance, but to the contrary, this more often than not results in a person that gets bogged down on one or two pieces of minutiae instead of having a wider scope...and in order to have nuance, you need a wide scope in order to be able to make finer and subtler distinctions on a wider variety of things.
Helpful Answer? (0)   (0)
Permalink | Report
Reply
October 08, 2009 11:31 PM
Well that is an interesting point, obviously not one that I have considered.
Report

Answer this Question


View All Belief and Thought Questions

Ask a Conundrum


140 characters left

Categories

Large Glass of Conundrum Wine

Welcome to ConundrumLand

Please enter your zip code.