Well, there's such a thing as making a bad situation worse, and loading a soused spouse, a burned child and a loaded driver into a car and speeding toward a hospital probably qualifies.

If they were at a campground, there should have been other campers or campground employees. If they were in the middle of a national Forrest all by themselves, fine, let the drunk guy drive his burned kid to the nearest sober person (not the hospital), like the nearest house or store. If the driver is pulled over, his DUI should serve as a reminder that wilderness camping (as well as drinking and driving) contains inherent dangers. There should always be at least one sober adult just in case something like this happens. His thinking after drinking is obviously clouded, but whose bright idea was it to bring a young child out into the wilderness, start a fire, and then drink to the extent where you are possibly not able to supervise the child or provide first aid or transportation? The decision to drink beyond the legal driving limit while exposing a child to the dangers of an open fire (let alone other campground dangers) was made while stone cold sober, and for that alone, the drinker deserves the DUI.

Never, never, never start a fire and allow children access to it while you drink to the extent where you cannot supervise the child and/or drive to a hospital legally.

Drink responsibly.