I tried to take the test twice and also got an error message both times. I was curious as to how it would come out. I did go and read the about us page. I was curious as to how this came about. I'm much too lazy to read all of the supposed scientific research behind the tests. Like all tests though, and like all research, you can get different answers depending on which test you take. I have taken the Myer's Briggs test and was told that teaching was not a career path for me and that business was. It was interesting because I am a teacher and I really don't like business. So I was curious as to what this brief test would say. I'll try it again later.

However, I also know enough about statistical tests to know that while this is scientifically valid, according to the tests that were performed on the personality measure, if put through other statistical tests, it might not be valid at all. What I mean is different statistical tests will yield different results. Some could lead to statistical significance, and others will not. Statistical significance, itself, merely means that, yes...according to the tests that we have performed (often a specific formula for the variable with other variable eliminated), that what we found probably couldn't have happened by accident. The two keys here are the variables eliminated and the specific formula for the test. Now, all statistical computation has to be done this way in order to get an answer. But that doesn't mean that all probable computations were done. Statistics also relies on a best fit line. So we don't know about the outliers because these are often ignored in order to make the best line fit.

So, without reading the actual scientific tests and knowing what was done, what was left out, etc. I'm give a healthy dose of skepticism to any and all of these tests. They are cheaper than a therapist I suppose.