Answered Conundrum Next Conundrum

Who should decide what medical tests are paid for by insurance?

Should the doctor decide what tests are needed? Should insurance companies go by national guidelines? Should a patient be able to ask for any test, as often as they want, and have it paid for? The recent example is the Mammogram.

http://www.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/11/19/mammogram.guidelines.insurance/index.html
Interesting Question? Yes (0) No (0)
RSS

Best Answer Chosen by Asker

Marked as Best! November 20, 2009 02:21 PM
There is no easy answer, as each option has disadvantages. . .

The insurance company:

Pros: The company can offset costs by denying some tests, lowering insurance costs for everyone.
Cons: The doctor is usually the most qualified to determine the need for the tests.

The Doctor:

Pros: The doctor is usually the most qualified to determine the need for the tests.
Cons: Unethical doctors may wish to request this as often as possible to add visits and get paid more money, driving up insurance costs for everyone. Even ethical doctors may be tempted to run every test possible just to make sure they can find the root of a problem . . . which isn't bad unless the test has a very low chance of helping.

The Patient:

Pros: This is the option that gives the patient the most control of thier own health.
Cons: Patients rarely have the medical backround to understand when and why a test may be needed. People who get every test they can to be careful will drive up insurance costs.

I think the best system would be a system that allows for a mixture of the above. Ex. Let doctors decide after consulting the patient, but if an insurance company audit notices that everyone is getting expensive tests for no apparent reason they should be able to step in.
Asker's Rating:
Helpful Answer? (0)   (0)
Permalink | Report
Reply

Other Answers (3)
Sort By

November 20, 2009 02:06 PM
Whoever decides, it's the consumer who will get caught in the middle! I think we do need a set of national guidelines for insurance companies, but I would like to see them remain privately owned. Patients should not be able to ask for any test just because they want it and expect insurance to pay for it, but patients are also consumers and should be knowledgeable about tests that are available to them. If a patient feels a certain test might help, he's always free to suggest it to his doctor, or go to another doctor if the first refuses it to them.

I think doctors should be able to order any test they think is helpful to evaluate or treat the patient's condition, but I can understand why insurance companies want to keep costs down. It's become a vicious cycle; once people started having good medical insurance then fraud became an issue, so natually insurance companies put linmits and restrictions on what they'll pay for. It would be nice if patients' doctors and insurance companies could work together for the benefit of the patient, and patients wouldn't have to fight with the insurance company to pay for tests that the doctor feels are vital.
Helpful Answer? (0)   (0)
Permalink | Report
Reply
November 20, 2009 05:54 PM
The individual should decide what tests he/she deems necessary and by virtue of that get. This does not mean that the insurance company should pay for every test that the patient wants.

I do not know when the concept of health INSURANCE came to be viewed as one's health treatment plan.

An insurance company is a business, they are basically purchasing risk in the process helping individuals offset their own risk and earning profit for themselves in the process. As such, the insurance company should determine what it will pay for and under what circumstances. The patient should be prepared to pay for that which an insurance plan will not offset, but they want or otherwise deem necessary.

This is why individuals should learn from the earliest moments of their adult existence that they should be responsible for their own health care, such as their own food, clothing and shelter. That the final risk is their own. If they engage in risky health behavior, there may be a price further down the road. If there is a history of disease in a family, save for that eventuality; don't be so eager to assign money as discretionary without first thinking ahead. They should learn that an insurance company is there, not to assume the responsibility of their health and well being, but merely as a method to offset the risk of certain higher end health costs.

Playing a ping-pong game of one day health care being the insurance companies' responsibility, and the next day its the government's responsibility, and back again; while never recognizing that health care is not a supreme individual right, but rather a supreme individual responsibility, places every individual at greater risk.
Helpful Answer? (0)   (0)
Permalink | Report
Reply
November 22, 2009 07:56 AM
So many questions so little money. With the new health insurance overhaul the changes that happen wont make anyone happy. Lets look at what we have already. If your in the hospital and are insured their is still a cap on what insurances will pay for. Let me explain it better If you go to the hospital for lets say a broken toe. During that stay you needed a treatment for a new onset of breathing problems your insurance company may not pay for those treatments because your addmitting diagnosis did not include respiratory problems. So any treatments you received will come out of pocket. Now the government has these rules set for all programs they have running now. So going back to who will pay for all those "needed" test. If the governmant runs the healthcare system then all costs will be split among all the taxpayers. The down side to that is who will run those tests and what quality standards to they have to adhear to? You cant sue the government espically if your getting"FREE" care. Their is no ultimate solution for the services/ cost equation. As the doctor you put years into your education to make decisions that would help the outcome of the patient. The insurance company is just that a (company) buisness, they have overhead and investers they have to ansure to. If the patient were to ask for any test they wanted how would they know what to do after they received the results? Simple common sence will be the foundation for what is needed to help the current status of health care.
Helpful Answer? (0)   (0)
Permalink | Report
Reply

Answer this Question


View All Health and Fitness Questions

Ask a Conundrum


140 characters left

Categories

Large Glass of Conundrum Wine

Welcome to ConundrumLand

Please enter your zip code.