Answered Conundrum Next Conundrum

Should you get a bailout if you have a lot of credit card debt?

I've heard a lot of advertising about debt settlement or debt negotiation. Seems that plenty of folks are eager to convince you that you shouldn't have to pay your entire debt if if you owe $10,000 or more in credit card debt, and you fall behind on your payments (I even heard one person say you should fall behind on purpose). How does that square with your own personal values? Do you feel entitled to debt negotiation or obligated to pay your debt?
Interesting Question? Yes (2) No (1)
RSS

Best Answer Chosen by Asker

Marked as Best! October 22, 2009 11:46 PM
I believe it's wrong for people to just rack up debt then try to get out of it through various sources.  But there are those who don't have any choice but to put essential costs on credit cards and then end up in trouble when they can't afford everyday things.  These people really need help and should look to debt relief for help.
Here is a good article on debt relief.  It walks you through some things you should do to get out of your credit card debt.  With the soaring unemployment rate, people need to get out of debt and start saving their money for emergencies.

Source(s):
http://www.zestbit.com/wyattbobo/view/Debt-Management.aspx
Asker's Rating:
Helpful Answer? (0)   (0)
Permalink | Report
Reply

Other Answers (6)
Sort By

October 22, 2009 05:20 PM
I know that many people take the side that credit card companies are excessive in their fees, and that some even use predatory practices to "trick" card holders into higher rates.. The way I few it, they are a business. All the information pertaining to the details of your agreement with them are readily available to you, just that most people are too lazy to read all of the fine print. I suppose it is the byproduct of an instant gratification society, why read boring stuff when I can get such a great deal today!

High interest rates and fees are no excuse to expect special settlements or bailouts, and even.less worthy is the person that irresponsibly charged up their credit cards without even thinking how the debt would be paid back.

Bail outs, be it for large companies, governments or individuals are never the right answer. True a lot of pain may come when one lives up to one's responsibilities, but in the long run it's cheaper and for the best.

Imagine, a world where people, companies and government HAVE to face the consequences of their actions.

Once personal responsibility is allowed to dim it darkens the future for everybody.
Helpful Answer? (0)   (0)
Permalink | Report
Reply
October 22, 2009 07:03 PM
No, You get bail-out, only when your bankruptcy hurts billions of people and potentially can bring down US economy! ;-)
Helpful Answer? (0)   (0)
Permalink | Report
Reply
October 22, 2009 07:06 PM
If you take out a credit card it is under the presumption that you are responsible for paying it back. It is borrowed money that you agreed, in all legality, to pay back. If something traumatic happened and you were able to honor your agreement and your payments, then assistance and understanding from the company would be useful, but you still owe that company the money. I have 2 credit cards I need to pay off. I've been in and out of employment over the last 2 years and putting food in my mouth and a roof over my head became far more important than my credit card bills. However, I am still fully aware of the fact that as soon as I'm able to pay them that I am more than obligated to pay them until my debt is paid off.

So no, I don't think people should default on their credit cards just to settle the debt. I think we, as a people, should stop looking for handouts and work our hardest to pay our debts or better yet sustain ourselves without going into debt!
Helpful Answer? (1)   (0)
Permalink | Report
Reply
October 22, 2009 07:32 PM
Overall, I would say bailouts are just irresponsible and anyone expecting one, or thinking they deserve one, is out of touch with reality. If you don't know that there is no such thing as free money, then you deserve to suffer poverty paying your debt back, so you can learn that. I also can't stand those "I settled my IRS dept for pennies on the dollar!" commercials because what they're really saying is "you paid my taxes for me, America, while my lawyer found me a loophole!"

That having been said, the credit card companies need to be regulated so they can't be so predatory. They are raising rates without notice, and punishing people disproportionately to their "crime," by doing things like doubling interest rates when the person's payment is two days late, and intentionally billing close to the due date so they increase the odds the payment will be late. In the past, companies have also been sued for intentionally not applying payments on time and overcharging fees that were not in the contracts. In those situations, the customer deserves a break, but from the credit card company, not the rest of us. The government should be helping people by cracking down on the private business that is bullying and stealing from people, not by giving the customer cash.
Helpful Answer? (0)   (0)
Permalink | Report
Reply
October 22, 2009 08:07 PM
Good point. The companies that raise their rates like that get no sympathy from me.
Report
October 22, 2009 07:44 PM
Debt negotiation is just that - negotiation, so it doesn't cross any ethical lines in my mind. However, you don't need anyone to help you with it either; just call them up and do it yourself.

Also, if you're getting a bad deal and feel there are other options, you can simply exercise one of those other options. For instance, why not go to the bank and get a lower interest unsecured line of credit?

I don't think you should get a bailout if you have a lot of credit card debt, but you should take the initiative to see what you can do about it ethically and on your own terms.
Helpful Answer? (0)   (0)
Permalink | Report
Reply
October 22, 2009 08:08 PM
I kinda think it goes there when someone knowingly falls behind in their payments in order to qualify for the negotiations, but that's just MY opinion and I was asking for yours, so thanks for adding to the conversation. I sort of think if somebody has a bunch of stuff they bought and are using, they sort of ought to pay for it instead of the bank, or maybe bring some of it back to the bank. on the other hand, banks' have funds set aside for bad debt negotiations, so I can see that part, and you're right, nobody is making them negotiate. I don't mind truly needy people gettiing a break, but seems like some are playing the system can't be helped, I guess. Thanks for your reply, it made me think.
Report
October 22, 2009 09:15 PM
I believe that if you charge the item you should pay the money. You know you will get fees and interest when you sign up for it. To leave it so that we can all pay it is a terribly irresponsible thing to do.

The bail out for a huge company (AIG) made everyone so upset when they saw how the money was used, in my opinion it doesn't make it any better to do the same for people that wanted more than they could afford at the time.
Helpful Answer? (0)   (0)
Permalink | Report
Reply

Answer this Question


View All Money Questions

Ask a Conundrum


140 characters left

Categories

Large Glass of Conundrum Wine

Welcome to ConundrumLand

Please enter your zip code.