Answered Conundrum Next Conundrum
Should Rage Against the Machine be allowed back on Radio Five Live's Breakfast Show?
RATM was asked to cut a string of f-words from one of their songs. They agreed, but uttered the words anyway during the actual performance.
Full story here:
http://www.tmz.com/2009/12/17/rage-against-the-machine-killing-in-the-name-radio-show-eff-cuss-explicit/
Interesting Question?
Yes (0)
No (0)
Full story here:
http://www.tmz.com/2009/12/17/rage-against-the-machine-killing-in-the-name-radio-show-eff-cuss-explicit/
RSS
Best Answer Chosen by Asker
Marked as Best!
December 18, 2009 02:41 PM
Helpful Answer?
(0)
(0)
Permalink |
Report
Let me get this straight:
RATM promised to do something, and then broke their promise? They promised not to have swearing in their song, and then put swearing in their song anyway?
If they broke a promise to a business partner (the radio station), why would that business partner want to help them make any money?
No! RATM should not be allowed back on Radio Five Live's Breakfast Show.
RATM promised to do something, and then broke their promise? They promised not to have swearing in their song, and then put swearing in their song anyway?
If they broke a promise to a business partner (the radio station), why would that business partner want to help them make any money?
No! RATM should not be allowed back on Radio Five Live's Breakfast Show.
| Asker's Rating: |
(0)
(0)
Permalink |
Report
Reply
Other Answers (2)
December 18, 2009 02:32 PM
(0)
(0)
Permalink |
Report
Well no, it's like with small children. You have to follow rules in life even if you don't like them and there should be consequences if you don't. In this case, I think not being allowed to perform on Radio Five is a sufficient consequence for not following the rules. They obviously didn't care enough at the time to consider that.
Helpful Answer?
(0)
(0)
Permalink |
Report
Reply