Answered Conundrum Next Conundrum
How old do you think a preteen/teen should be before he/she begins babysitting?
When it comes to non-familial children, when are kids old enough to start making money babysitting (even if it means starting with older kids, not babies)?
Interesting Question?
Yes (1)
No (0)
RSS
Best Answer Chosen by Asker
Marked as Best!
October 19, 2009 02:12 AM
Helpful Answer?
(0)
(0)
Permalink |
Report
I’d say it depends on the maturity and responsibility level of that teenager. I think preteen age (11 and 12) is way too young to assume the responsibility for another person’s child (or even a younger sibling). A 13-year old may start babysitting in most states to make some extra money, but I think that he or she should only be entrusted with older children between ages 7-9, never very young children. For infants, toddlers, preschoolers and Kindergarteners I would suggest finding a reliable teen who is at least 15 or 16 years old (preferably a little older even) and who has had previous experience dealing effectively and caringly with younger children (either through previous babysitting jobs or by watching and tending to their own younger siblings). It is important when choosing a babysitter to interview this teen and have him/her meet your child prior to their first time spent together. This way you have the opportunity to observe how the teen interacts with your child and how your child responds to the sitter. Be sure to ask the teen sufficient amounts of questions that quench your curiosity and put to rest any fears or uneasiness you may experience. Ask him/her how he would handle a given situation, for example when your child is sad, upset, won’t listen, or acts out. This will help you decide whether this particular sitter is a great caretaker match for your child and whether his/her presence in your home would allow you to feel comfortable enough to go about your business until you return back home.
| Asker's Rating: |
(0)
(0)
Permalink |
Report
Reply
Other Answers (5)
October 19, 2009 12:42 AM
(1)
(0)
Permalink |
Report
I'm glad you included, non-familial because that changes my answer.
I would say 14 at the youngest, however with my own child I'd be more likely to want someone at least 16 unless they were an impressively mature 14 year old. When I was in high school, 14 would have been my answer flat out, but with 12 nieces and nephews I'm well exposed to the current pre-teen generation and for the most part, I'd go 16 out of them. The maturity level just isn't the same.
Helpful Answer?
I would say 14 at the youngest, however with my own child I'd be more likely to want someone at least 16 unless they were an impressively mature 14 year old. When I was in high school, 14 would have been my answer flat out, but with 12 nieces and nephews I'm well exposed to the current pre-teen generation and for the most part, I'd go 16 out of them. The maturity level just isn't the same.
(1)
(0)
Permalink |
Report
Reply
October 19, 2009 02:48 AM
16 gets my vote. Some might even consider liability and legal age for a wage earner in their area. Any younger and the ability or experience handling an emergency just isn't there. In most areas someone who is 16 can drive in an emergency.
Report
October 19, 2009 04:40 AM
(0)
(0)
Permalink |
Report
For non-familial children I'd say never.
Call me silly, but I'd never trust my kids to a 14, 16 or even 18-year old I do not know. I'd much rather pay for someone that has gone trough training and has got propper education so they are able to resolve any unforeseen situationsthat might arrise.
Do you believe a 14-year old knows how to handle something as innocent as a paper cut? Just to point out one example.
Helpful Answer?
Call me silly, but I'd never trust my kids to a 14, 16 or even 18-year old I do not know. I'd much rather pay for someone that has gone trough training and has got propper education so they are able to resolve any unforeseen situationsthat might arrise.
Do you believe a 14-year old knows how to handle something as innocent as a paper cut? Just to point out one example.
(0)
(0)
Permalink |
Report
Reply
October 19, 2009 09:06 PM
(0)
(0)
Permalink |
Report
I started babysitting when I was twelve, but I don't really think it is a good idea. I would not feel completely comfortable. What if a real emergency happened? I think it would be fine for a sibling or a real familiar family friend, but not strangers. Each child matures differently though, I think 18 years old i best. What if a legal issue arose, an 18 year olds testimony would likely be considered legal.
Helpful Answer?
(0)
(0)
Permalink |
Report
Reply
October 19, 2009 09:43 PM
(0)
(0)
Permalink |
Report
If the children are going to be left solely in the charge of the baby sitter then i'd say that 16 is minimum age that I'd consider. Partly for legal reasons, but also for the level of maturity thats needed.
And not all 16 year olds would have that level of maturity either. So I'd have to know the baby sitter personally to see if I thought they were up to it.
After 18 I'd be prepared to take someone else's reccomendation
Helpful Answer?
And not all 16 year olds would have that level of maturity either. So I'd have to know the baby sitter personally to see if I thought they were up to it.
After 18 I'd be prepared to take someone else's reccomendation
(0)
(0)
Permalink |
Report
Reply