Answered Conundrum Next Conundrum
Best Answer Chosen by Asker
Marked as Best!
November 22, 2009 01:47 AM
Helpful Answer?
(0)
(0)
Permalink |
Report
This is a question that really has no right or wrong answer; there is no need to be sorry about being unable to afford such a great cost to save a pet. The question certainly invokes strong emotions, and it is understandable that it would be a difficult decision to have to make.
Perhaps a fairer question, also a question that might reveal more insight into how people who answer feel about their pets place in theirs or their family’s lives.
If you could afford $3,000.00 to spend on saving your pets life would you spend the money to do so? Is $3,000.00 to much money to spend on a pet or not?
If $3,000.00 dollars meant that my family or I would suffer and perhaps be devastated by spending it on our pet, then I would say that the human members of my family come first. How many people have been faced with this same dilemma with human loved ones and just could not afford to help their human loved ones?
I would say that if I was faced with this scenario, and I could not afford the money, I would do all I could to try and find a way to get the $3,000.00 needed to save my pet. I would ask and beg people I know or don't know for any assistance they could give. I would get a part-time job and try to get money if necessary.
It’s simple to answer if I could afford it, of course I would pay the money to save my pet. The operative word here is ‘save’. I was faced with a similar decision a few years ago, when my Sammy, our Golden Retriever, a beautiful, caring and constant companion to my entire family became sick. We spent close to $2,000.00 in tests, medicines etc to keep Sammy as comfortable as we could. The choice was presented, they could operate on Sammy and stop the immediate internal damages (his blood vessels were ballooning and bursting) but that would only extend his life by mere months and they could only do it once or twice before he would eventually pass away. Our decision, was to spend the money to keep him comfortable and to care for him without putting him through surgeries that would buy us no more real time with him as he would be in hospital and the convalescence and so we opted to spend as much time with Sammy as we could and then as a family when Sammy deteriorated to the point that he was leaving us, we all quietly sat with him as we had him euthanized by our vet.
Sammy's ashes now sit on the mantle by my home office desk.
Perhaps a fairer question, also a question that might reveal more insight into how people who answer feel about their pets place in theirs or their family’s lives.
If you could afford $3,000.00 to spend on saving your pets life would you spend the money to do so? Is $3,000.00 to much money to spend on a pet or not?
If $3,000.00 dollars meant that my family or I would suffer and perhaps be devastated by spending it on our pet, then I would say that the human members of my family come first. How many people have been faced with this same dilemma with human loved ones and just could not afford to help their human loved ones?
I would say that if I was faced with this scenario, and I could not afford the money, I would do all I could to try and find a way to get the $3,000.00 needed to save my pet. I would ask and beg people I know or don't know for any assistance they could give. I would get a part-time job and try to get money if necessary.
It’s simple to answer if I could afford it, of course I would pay the money to save my pet. The operative word here is ‘save’. I was faced with a similar decision a few years ago, when my Sammy, our Golden Retriever, a beautiful, caring and constant companion to my entire family became sick. We spent close to $2,000.00 in tests, medicines etc to keep Sammy as comfortable as we could. The choice was presented, they could operate on Sammy and stop the immediate internal damages (his blood vessels were ballooning and bursting) but that would only extend his life by mere months and they could only do it once or twice before he would eventually pass away. Our decision, was to spend the money to keep him comfortable and to care for him without putting him through surgeries that would buy us no more real time with him as he would be in hospital and the convalescence and so we opted to spend as much time with Sammy as we could and then as a family when Sammy deteriorated to the point that he was leaving us, we all quietly sat with him as we had him euthanized by our vet.
Sammy's ashes now sit on the mantle by my home office desk.
| Asker's Rating: |
(0)
(0)
Permalink |
Report
Reply
Other Answers (10)
November 21, 2009 07:08 AM
had to make this decision once or twice Helpful Answer?
(0)
(0)
Permalink |
Report
Depends on the dog...for example-an older dog that would have complications from the surgery?, probably not...a younger dog with every expectation that surgery would completely fix what is wrong? definately
Source(s):
had to make this decision once or twice Helpful Answer?
(0)
(0)
Permalink |
Report
Reply
November 21, 2009 09:12 AM
(0)
(0)
Permalink |
Report
No
I'm sorry but I've never in my life been able to afford something like that to help a pet.
Hundreds yes thousands no. Never rich enough.
It does make me remember the times I've had to sacrifice a pet because the cost was too great for my family to bear. You might not understand, but it does happen. I love my pets, I've always had pets, I've given them treatment that takes time and effort over months and months! - but not money. I've spent hours nursing my sick pets but I've always had a limit. I've done everything I could within limits. It's a cruel and horrible world when you have to make that choice. I remember each time it's been a sacrifice.
Helpful Answer?
I'm sorry but I've never in my life been able to afford something like that to help a pet.
Hundreds yes thousands no. Never rich enough.
It does make me remember the times I've had to sacrifice a pet because the cost was too great for my family to bear. You might not understand, but it does happen. I love my pets, I've always had pets, I've given them treatment that takes time and effort over months and months! - but not money. I've spent hours nursing my sick pets but I've always had a limit. I've done everything I could within limits. It's a cruel and horrible world when you have to make that choice. I remember each time it's been a sacrifice.
(0)
(0)
Permalink |
Report
Reply
November 21, 2009 03:34 PM
(0)
(0)
Permalink |
Report
All good answers. It's times like that, when I wish I had unlimited funds to care for my pets. I only just recently found out about pet health insurance, but I don't think that covers every circumstance, and it's costly.
We decided long ago, one of us had to be a full time parent for our family to always be here for our children and family, so, I don't work outside the home. This being the case, money has always been an issue when it comes to pet health care. So far, we have lost small pets, and our old dog is still our old dog. I think the most I spent on our dog was 400 and some change at one vet visit. But truly, I dread the not to distant future when we will have to tell our children the day when our old dog dies, because if the vet tries to get us to save her, we will probably put her down, rather than see her in misery, because we cannot afford a long drawn out sickness.
Helpful Answer?
We decided long ago, one of us had to be a full time parent for our family to always be here for our children and family, so, I don't work outside the home. This being the case, money has always been an issue when it comes to pet health care. So far, we have lost small pets, and our old dog is still our old dog. I think the most I spent on our dog was 400 and some change at one vet visit. But truly, I dread the not to distant future when we will have to tell our children the day when our old dog dies, because if the vet tries to get us to save her, we will probably put her down, rather than see her in misery, because we cannot afford a long drawn out sickness.
(0)
(0)
Permalink |
Report
Reply
November 22, 2009 02:02 AM
(0)
(0)
Permalink |
Report
Once i bring a dog at home, means i am adding another family members and i feel a special bonding between us as i do feel with other family members. he too gives full attention to me and makes me feel an important person in his or her life. then how does money matters when it is a question of saving is life. i would not think a single minute to do so if required.
Helpful Answer?
(0)
(0)
Permalink |
Report
Reply
November 22, 2009 02:23 AM
(0)
(0)
Permalink |
Report
well i would because a dog is a life and is like humans but you can spend the money on helping people that need help like surgery and cannot afford paying for it that will be more usefull and you will feel that you have achieved something in helping the humanity.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DJjJ5WB3izg
Helpful Answer?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DJjJ5WB3izg
(0)
(0)
Permalink |
Report
Reply
November 25, 2009 11:51 PM
(0)
(0)
Permalink |
Report
You bet I would. I had to put my best friend Mike, down last summer. He was a golden retriever and had an undiagnosed large tumor that burst. No one would have detected this unless he had an ultrasound and that is not typical for a regular vet visit. If I had known, we could have saved him via surgery. He was with me 24/7 and I miss him terribly. Got him as a pup and a stray to boot. Used to do pick and mail delivery every day for me, he was missed by the post office as well. Never gave an indication of tumor at all. I would have no hesistation whatsoever to spend the money to keep my friend with me.
Helpful Answer?
(0)
(0)
Permalink |
Report
Reply

kty2777
If I could I would, no question.
dtvrivera